Home›Compare›Cost of Living›Bismarck vs Chicago

Cost of Living: Bismarck, ND vs Chicago, IL

Wondering how far your dollar stretches in Bismarck compared to Chicago? Below we break down housing costs, rent, taxes, income, and quality of life using 2026 data so you can make an informed relocation or remote-work decision. Every number is computed from Census, BLS, and Zillow data specific to these two metro areas.

TL;DR

Bismarck cost-of-living index is 92 vs 114 for Chicago (US = 100). Median home: $285,000 vs $315,000. Median rent: $950/mo vs $2,288/mo.

Source: Census ACS · Zillow ZHVI/ZORI · BEA RPP, 2026

↑
Chicago is 23.9% more expensive than Bismarck
COL Index: Bismarck 92 vs Chicago 114 (national avg = 100)
Written by Jere Salmisto, Founder & Quantitative Systems Builder, CalcFi·Reviewed by CalcFi Editorial·Last reviewed 2026-04-19

Bismarck vs Chicago — At a Glance

BismarckMetricChicagoDifference
92Cost of Living Index114+23.9%
$285,000Median Home Price$315,000+10.5%
$950Median Monthly Rent$2,288+140.8%
$68,200Median Household Income$70,100+2.8%
1.0%Property Tax Rate2.1%+110.0%
2.5%Unemployment Rate4.6%+84.0%
17 minAverage Commute31 min+82.4%
36.5Median Age36.7+0.5%
135,000Metro Population9,560,000+6981.5%

Data sourced from Census Bureau, BLS, Zillow, and ApartmentAdvisor (2024-2025). COL Index: 100 = national average.

Housing Comparison: Bismarck vs Chicago

Monthly mortgage assumes 6.5% interest, 30-year fixed, 20.0%down payment. PITI includes principal, interest, property tax, and homeowner's insurance.

Bismarck

Median Home Price$285,000
Down Payment (20.0%)$57,000
Loan Amount$228,000
Principal & Interest$1,441/mo
Property Tax$238/mo
Insurance$83/mo
Monthly PITI$1,762/mo

Chicago

Median Home Price$315,000
Down Payment (20.0%)$63,000
Loan Amount$252,000
Principal & Interest$1,593/mo
Property Tax$551/mo
Insurance$92/mo
Monthly PITI$2,236/mo

Rent & Affordability Ratios

Median Monthly Rent$950 vs $2,288 (+$1,338/mo)
Annual Rent Difference$16,056/yr more in Chicago
Home Price-to-Income Ratio4.2x (Bismarck) vs 4.5x (Chicago)
Years to Save 20% Down (15% savings rate)5.6 yrs (Bismarck) vs 6.0 yrs (Chicago)

Buying a home in Bismarck costs $1,762/month (PITI) compared to $2,236/month in Chicago — a difference of $474/month or $5,688/year. The price-to-income ratio is 4.2x in Bismarck versus 4.5x in Chicago, suggesting Bismarck is relatively more affordable for homebuyers relative to local incomes. At a 15% savings rate, it takes 5.6 years to save a down payment in Bismarck compared to 6.0 years in Chicago.

Tax Comparison: Bismarck vs Chicago

Estimated on each city's median household income, single filer, standard deduction, 2025 rates.

Tax CategoryBismarckChicago
Gross Income$68,200$70,100
State Income Tax$92$3,329
Federal Income Tax$6,453$6,871
FICA (SS + Medicare)$5,217$5,362
Property Tax (on median home)$2,850/yr$6,615/yr
State Sales Tax Rate5.0%6.3%
Total Tax Burden$11,762 (17.2%)$15,562 (22.2%)
Take-Home Pay$56,438$54,538

On median household income, total taxes (federal + state + FICA) come to $11,762 in Bismarck (17.2% effective) versus $15,562 in Chicago (22.2% effective). After taxes, take-home pay is $56,438 in Bismarck and $54,538 in Chicago. Property taxes add $2,850/year on the median Bismarck home versus $6,615/year in Chicago.

Salary Equivalence: What Your Income Is Worth

A $68,200 salary in Bismarck equals
$84,509
in Chicago
A $70,100 salary in Chicago equals
$56,572
in Bismarck

These figures adjust for cost of living using the formula: adjusted = salary × (COL_destination / COL_origin). If you earn $68,200 in Bismarck (COL 92) and relocate to Chicago (COL 114), you would need $84,509 to maintain the same purchasing power. This means you would need a raise of $16,309 to maintain the same standard of living in Chicago.

Quality of Life: Bismarck vs Chicago

Average Commute
17 min
Bismarck
31 min
Chicago
14 min shorter in Bismarck
Unemployment Rate
2.5%
Bismarck
4.6%
Chicago
Bismarck lower
Metro Population
0.1M
Bismarck
9.6M
Chicago
Chicago is 70.8x larger

Beyond costs, quality of life matters. The average commute in Bismarck is 17 minutes versus 31 minutes in Chicago, a difference of 14 minutes each way. Bismarck's lower unemployment rate of 2.5% versus 4.6% suggests a stronger job market. Chicago skews slightly older with a median age of 36.7 vs 36.5 in Bismarck.

Other Cost of Living Comparisons

Bismarck vs New YorkCOL 92 vs 187Bismarck vs Los AngelesCOL 92 vs 173Bismarck vs DallasCOL 92 vs 105Chicago vs New YorkCOL 114 vs 187Chicago vs Los AngelesCOL 114 vs 173Chicago vs DallasCOL 114 vs 105

Related Calculators

🏙️
Cost of Living in Bismarck
Detailed COL breakdown
🏙️
Cost of Living in Chicago
Detailed COL breakdown
🏠
Mortgage Affordability — Bismarck
How much house can you afford?
🏠
Mortgage Affordability — Chicago
How much house can you afford?
🔑
Rent vs Buy — Bismarck
Should you rent or own?
⏱️
Salary to Hourly Calculator
Convert $68,200 to hourly
Software Developer Salary — BismarckSoftware Developer Salary — ChicagoRegistered Nurse Salary — BismarckRegistered Nurse Salary — ChicagoAccountant Salary — BismarckAccountant Salary — ChicagoRent vs Buy — ChicagoProperty Tax — BismarckProperty Tax — Chicago

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Bismarck or Chicago more expensive?

Chicago is 23.9% more expensive than Bismarck overall. Chicago has a cost of living index of 114 compared to 92 for Bismarck (national average = 100). The biggest difference is housing: the median home costs $315,000 in Chicago vs $285,000 in Bismarck.

How much more does housing cost in Chicago vs Bismarck?

The median home price in Chicago is $315,000, which is $30,000 more than Bismarck's median of $285,000. Monthly rent follows a similar pattern: $2,288/month in Chicago vs $950/month in Bismarck, a difference of $1,338/month or $16,056/year.

What salary do I need in Chicago to match my Bismarck income?

To maintain the same standard of living, a $68,200 salary in Bismarck is equivalent to $84,509 in Chicago. This is based on the cost of living index ratio: Bismarck's COL index of 92 vs Chicago's 114. Conversely, $70,100 in Chicago equals $56,572 in Bismarck.

Which city has lower taxes, Bismarck or Chicago?

On a median household income, the combined federal, state, and FICA tax burden is $11,762 (17.2% effective rate) in Bismarck vs $15,562 (22.2% effective rate) in Chicago. Property taxes on the median home are $2,850/year in Bismarck (1.0% rate) vs $6,615/year in Chicago (2.1% rate). Sales tax rates are 5.0% in North Dakota and 6.3% in Illinois.

What is the median household income in Bismarck and Chicago?

Bismarck median household income: $68,200/yr. Chicago median household income: $70,100/yr (Census ACS).

How does rent compare in Bismarck vs Chicago?

Median monthly rent: $950 in Bismarck vs $2,288 in Chicago. Annualized that is $11,400 vs $27,456.

Which city is better for remote workers, Bismarck or Chicago?

Bismarck offers a lower cost of living (index 92 vs 114), which lets remote-workers keeping a coastal salary stretch further. Chicago typically wins on amenities and labor-market depth.

Where does the data on this comparison come from?

Bismarck and Chicago numbers are pulled from Zillow ZHVI/ZORI (home values, rent), the U.S. Census Bureau ACS (income, demographics), and BEA RPP (cost-of-living index). Each value is timestamped on the page.

How often is this Bismarck vs Chicago comparison updated?

Source feeds (Zillow, Freddie Mac PMMS, Census ACS, BEA RPP) are refreshed on their native cadence. Page caches revalidate every 24 hours via Next.js ISR.

Does this comparison replace tax or financial advice?

No. The Bismarck vs Chicago cost-of-living page is educational reference using public data and standard formulas. It is not personalized tax, legal, or investment advice. Consult a licensed professional for material decisions.

Explore More

All City ComparisonsBismarck COL CalculatorChicago COL CalculatorSalary GuidesMortgage Affordability CalculatorRent vs Buy Calculator

Sources & Citations

  1. Zillow Research — ZHVI (home values) & ZORI (observed rent index) — zillow.com/research/data
  2. U.S. Census Bureau — American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year estimates — census.gov/acs
  3. Bureau of Economic Analysis — Regional Price Parities by state and MSA — bea.gov/rpp
  4. Tax Foundation — effective state and local tax rates — taxfoundation.org
  5. Freddie Mac PMMS — weekly national average mortgage rates — freddiemac.com/pmms
  6. Internal Revenue Service — federal income tax brackets and standard deduction — irs.gov
  7. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics — unemployment and wage statistics — bls.gov
Methodology & Assumptions

Home prices use Zillow Home Value Index (ZHVI)[1]; rents use Zillow Observed Rent Index (ZORI)[1]. Median household income comes from the Census ACS 5-year estimates[2].

COL indices use the BEA Regional Price Parity methodology[3], normalized so 100 = national average.

Property tax rates are effective rates from the Tax Foundation[4], expressed as % of owner-occupied home value. Mortgage estimates assume 6.5% fixed rate[5], 30-year term, 20.0% down, $1,800/yr homeowners insurance.

Federal tax calculations[6] assume single filer, standard deduction. State tax uses the top marginal rate times taxable income after the state standard deduction. FICA = 6.2% Social Security (up to wage base) + 1.45% Medicare.

Salary equivalence uses adjusted = salary × (COL_destination / COL_origin). This captures cost-of-living shift but not state income tax differences.

Unemployment figures are the most recent monthly MSA-level readings from the BLS LAUS series[7].

Last reviewed is computed from the maximum retrievedAt across every source this page consumes.

City data from Census Bureau[2], BLS[7], and Zillow[1] (2024-2025). Tax calculations use 2025 IRS rates[6], single filer, standard deduction. Mortgage estimates assume 6.5% PMMS rate[5], 30-year term, 20.0% down. COL Index: 100 = national average[3]. Last reviewed 2026-04-19.