Wondering how far your dollar stretches in Tulsa compared to Rochester? Below we break down housing costs, rent, taxes, income, and quality of life using 2026 data so you can make an informed relocation or remote-work decision. Every number is computed from Census, BLS, and Zillow data specific to these two metro areas.
| Tulsa | Metric | Rochester | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 86 | Cost of Living Index | 86 | +0.0% |
| $205,000 | Median Home Price | $185,000 | -9.8% |
| $875 | Median Monthly Rent | $1,250 | +42.9% |
| $57,400 | Median Household Income | $56,200 | -2.1% |
| 0.9% | Property Tax Rate | 2.6% | +188.9% |
| 3.8% | Unemployment Rate | 3.8% | +0.0% |
| 21 min | Average Commute | 21 min | +0.0% |
| 35.8 | Median Age | 37.5 | +4.7% |
| 1,030,000 | Metro Population | 1,090,000 | +5.8% |
Data sourced from Census Bureau, BLS, Zillow, and ApartmentAdvisor (2024-2025). COL Index: 100 = national average.
Monthly mortgage assumes 6.5% interest, 30-year fixed, 20.0%down payment. PITI includes principal, interest, property tax, and homeowner's insurance.
Buying a home in Tulsa costs $1,250/month (PITI) compared to $1,390/month in Rochester — a difference of $140/month or $1,680/year. The price-to-income ratio is 3.6x in Tulsa versus 3.3x in Rochester, suggesting Rochester is relatively more affordable for homebuyers relative to local incomes. At a 15% savings rate, it takes 4.8 years to save a down payment in Tulsa compared to 4.4 years in Rochester.
Estimated on each city's median household income, single filer, standard deduction, 2025 rates.
| Tax Category | Tulsa | Rochester |
|---|---|---|
| Gross Income | $57,400 | $56,200 |
| State Income Tax | $2,189 | $2,486 |
| Federal Income Tax | $4,759 | $4,615 |
| FICA (SS + Medicare) | $4,391 | $4,299 |
| Property Tax (on median home) | $1,845/yr | $4,810/yr |
| State Sales Tax Rate | 4.5% | 4.0% |
| Total Tax Burden | $11,339 (19.8%) | $11,400 (20.3%) |
| Take-Home Pay | $46,061 | $44,800 |
On median household income, total taxes (federal + state + FICA) come to $11,339 in Tulsa (19.8% effective) versus $11,400 in Rochester (20.3% effective). After taxes, take-home pay is $46,061 in Tulsa and $44,800 in Rochester. Property taxes add $1,845/year on the median Tulsa home versus $4,810/year in Rochester.
These figures adjust for cost of living using the formula: adjusted = salary × (COL_destination / COL_origin). If you earn $57,400 in Tulsa (COL 86) and relocate to Rochester (COL 86), you would need $57,400 to maintain the same purchasing power. This means your salary should stay roughly the same.
Beyond costs, quality of life matters. The average commute in Tulsa is 21 minutes versus 21 minutes in Rochester, a difference of 0 minutes each way. Both cities have similar unemployment rates around 3.8%. Rochester skews slightly older with a median age of 37.5 vs 35.8 in Tulsa.
Tulsa and Rochester have very similar costs of living, with COL indices of 86 and 86 respectively (national average = 100). Day-to-day expenses, housing, and taxes are comparable between the two metro areas.
The median home price in Rochester is $185,000, which is $20,000 more than Tulsa's median of $205,000. Monthly rent follows a similar pattern: $1,250/month in Rochester vs $875/month in Tulsa, a difference of $375/month or $4,500/year.
To maintain the same standard of living, a $57,400 salary in Tulsa is equivalent to $57,400 in Rochester. This is based on the cost of living index ratio: Tulsa's COL index of 86 vs Rochester's 86. Conversely, $56,200 in Rochester equals $56,200 in Tulsa.
On a median household income, the combined federal, state, and FICA tax burden is $11,339 (19.8% effective rate) in Tulsa vs $11,400 (20.3% effective rate) in Rochester. Property taxes on the median home are $1,845/year in Tulsa (0.9% rate) vs $4,810/year in Rochester (2.6% rate). Sales tax rates are 4.5% in Oklahoma and 4.0% in New York.
Tulsa median household income: $57,400/yr. Rochester median household income: $56,200/yr (Census ACS).
Median monthly rent: $875 in Tulsa vs $1,250 in Rochester. Annualized that is $10,500 vs $15,000.
Tulsa offers a lower cost of living (index 86 vs 86), which lets remote-workers keeping a coastal salary stretch further. Rochester typically wins on amenities and labor-market depth.
Tulsa and Rochester numbers are pulled from Zillow ZHVI/ZORI (home values, rent), the U.S. Census Bureau ACS (income, demographics), and BEA RPP (cost-of-living index). Each value is timestamped on the page.
Source feeds (Zillow, Freddie Mac PMMS, Census ACS, BEA RPP) are refreshed on their native cadence. Page caches revalidate every 24 hours via Next.js ISR.
No. The Tulsa vs Rochester cost-of-living page is educational reference using public data and standard formulas. It is not personalized tax, legal, or investment advice. Consult a licensed professional for material decisions.
Home prices use Zillow Home Value Index (ZHVI)[1]; rents use Zillow Observed Rent Index (ZORI)[1]. Median household income comes from the Census ACS 5-year estimates[2].
COL indices use the BEA Regional Price Parity methodology[3], normalized so 100 = national average.
Property tax rates are effective rates from the Tax Foundation[4], expressed as % of owner-occupied home value. Mortgage estimates assume 6.5% fixed rate[5], 30-year term, 20.0% down, $1,800/yr homeowners insurance.
Federal tax calculations[6] assume single filer, standard deduction. State tax uses the top marginal rate times taxable income after the state standard deduction. FICA = 6.2% Social Security (up to wage base) + 1.45% Medicare.
Salary equivalence uses adjusted = salary × (COL_destination / COL_origin). This captures cost-of-living shift but not state income tax differences.
Unemployment figures are the most recent monthly MSA-level readings from the BLS LAUS series[7].
Last reviewed is computed from the maximum retrievedAt across every source this page consumes.
City data from Census Bureau[2], BLS[7], and Zillow[1] (2024-2025). Tax calculations use 2025 IRS rates[6], single filer, standard deduction. Mortgage estimates assume 6.5% PMMS rate[5], 30-year term, 20.0% down. COL Index: 100 = national average[3]. Last reviewed .