Maps/Home Affordability (Price-to-Income) by State/Rhode Island
State Index · Home Affordability · Rhode Island · 2023
5.876

Average Home Affordability in Rhode Island

Rank #9 of 50121.8% of national averageSource: Census ACS + Zillow (ACS 2023 × ZHVI 2026)

Rhode Island ranks #9 of 51 for home affordability in 2026.

Rhode Island home affordability →Compare statesDownload image
  • Salary
  • Tax Burden
  • Cost of Living
  • Mortgage
  • Rent
  • Affordability
Census ACS + Zillow, ACS 2023 × ZHVI 2026 · updated Apr 2026
Home Affordability (Price-to-Income) by State map showing 51 states. Hover or tap a state for details.
Loading map…

Home Affordability (Price-to-Income) by State

Low → High

  • 3.1 – 3.711 states
  • 3.7 – 4.410 states
  • 4.4 – 5.010 states
  • 5.0 – 5.810 states
  • 5.8 – 8.710 states
Full ranking

All 50 states ranked

Source: Census ACS + Zillow (ACS 2023 × ZHVI 2026)

RankStateHome Affordability (Price-to-Income)% of US
1Hawaii8.738181.1%
2California8.109168.1%
3Montana6.595136.7%
4Massachusetts6.576136.3%
5Washington6.353131.7%
6Idaho6.316130.9%
7Oregon6.225129.0%
8New York6.185128.2%
9Rhode Island5.876121.8%
10Nevada5.852121.3%
Show all 50 states (41 more) ↓Show top 10 only ↑
11Colorado5.832120.9%
12Utah5.757119.3%
13New Jersey5.707118.3%
14Maine5.528114.6%
15Arizona5.475113.5%
16District of Columbia5.388111.7%
17New Hampshire5.239108.6%
18Florida5.124106.2%
19New Mexico5.087105.4%
20Wyoming5.016104.0%
21Delaware4.952102.6%
22Tennessee4.933102.2%
23Vermont4.852100.6%
24Connecticut4.76198.7%
25North Carolina4.75198.5%
26Virginia4.58695.1%
27South Carolina4.48593.0%
28Alaska4.47592.8%
29Georgia4.44992.2%
30Wisconsin4.42491.7%
31South Dakota4.41691.5%
32Maryland4.35590.3%
33Minnesota4.07484.4%
34Texas3.97182.3%
35Missouri3.83779.5%
36Pennsylvania3.8379.4%
37Alabama3.80178.8%
38Kentucky3.79478.6%
39Arkansas3.78378.4%
40Michigan3.75677.9%
41North Dakota3.71276.9%
42Nebraska3.70776.8%
43Indiana3.65875.8%
44Louisiana3.63575.3%
45Ohio3.57374.1%
46Mississippi3.55973.8%
47Illinois3.55873.7%
48Oklahoma3.54873.5%
49Kansas3.4872.1%
50Iowa3.24267.2%
51West Virginia3.11764.6%

Updated 2026-04-25. Click any state for the full breakdown.

FAQ

Rhode Island home affordability: common questions

What is the average home affordability in Rhode Island?

Rhode Island home affordability is 5.876 as of ACS 2023 × ZHVI 2026, according to Census ACS + Zillow. That puts Rhode Island at rank #9 of 50 US states, above the national average of 4.824.

How does Rhode Island compare to nearby states?

Among Rhode Island's neighbors, Connecticut shows 4.761, Massachusetts shows 6.576. Use the CalcFi compare view to line all of them up: /maps/compare?cat=affordability&states=ri,ct,ma. Nearby states share labor markets and housing corridors, so the comparison is usually the most relevant one.

Which Rhode Island metros have the highest home affordability?

Top Rhode Island metros include Providence, Warwick, and Cranston. City-level home affordability data drops in Q3 2026 once BLS releases its metro-area tables for the year. Providence is the state capital. Until then, the state-level number is the best available read.

More on this state

Rhode Island data, by category

Salary in Rhode Island →Tax burden in Rhode Island →Cost of living in Rhode Island →Mortgage rate in Rhode Island →Rent in Rhode Island →

Nearby states

Connecticut home affordability →Massachusetts home affordability →

Related calculators

  • Mortgage affordability calculator →
  • Cost of living comparison →

Top Rhode Island cities · Home Affordability (Price-to-Income) by State

1 cities ranked by home affordability (price-to-income) by state. Lower is better.

Compare top 1 →

Note: Median home price divided by median household income. State map uses Zillow ZHVI ÷ ACS B19013; city uses Census/Zillow seed — same formula, different vintage.

  1. 1Providencepop 1,640k5.7
Methodology

Price-to-income ratio computed as Zillow ZHVI (state median home value, all homes, smoothed seasonally adjusted) divided by Census ACS 1-year median household income (B19013). Higher ratio = harder to afford. Both inputs are state aggregates — county and metro variance can be substantial.