Calculate how much life or disability coverage you may want to fully replace lost income.
Auto-updated · Verified daily against IRS, Fed & Treasury sources
Enter your numbers below
Based on your inputs
Reality Score:save 3 numbers across housing, debt & cash to see how your full picture holds up (0–100). One calc alone can't tell you that.
Stays in your browser. Never sent to us.
Analyze 3+ calcs to unlock your Financial Picture dashboard (cross-analysis of all your numbers).
If you disappeared tomorrow, could your family maintain their lifestyle without you? This isn't a morbid question — it's the foundation of financial responsibility. Your income is the engine that powers your family's current and future stability. When that engine stops — whether through death or disability — the financial impact is immediate and severe.
Income replacement insurance (life insurance, disability insurance, or both) is the financial equivalent of a parachute. It's not fun to think about, which is why most Americans under-insure dramatically. The result: unexpected death or disability creates financial catastrophe for millions of families annually.
Income replacement means: if you die or become unable to work, your family receives enough money to maintain their standard of living until they achieve financial independence (could work, living costs decline, or investments generate sufficient passive income).
This is distinct from debt payoff or education funding, which are separate insurance needs. Income replacement is purely about replacing the cash flow you currently provide.
1. The Income Gap
How much annual income would your family need if you were gone? This is often less than your current income (some expenses disappear, like work commuting) but might be the same or higher if a spouse leaves work to manage household tasks.
2. The Time Horizon
For how many years would the family need this income? Ideally until the surviving spouse reaches age 65+ and can access retirement accounts, or until investments grow large enough to generate the needed income passively. For a 35-year-old with a stay-at-home spouse, this might be 30 years.
3. The Discount Rate
Money today is worth more than money tomorrow (due to inflation and investment growth). If you invest $100,000 at 6% annual return over 20 years, it grows to $320,714. This is why insurance needs are calculated in present value, not nominal future dollars.
Present value of needed income is calculated as:
PV = Annual Income × [(1 - (1+r)^-n) / r]
Where:
Example: A 40-year-old earns $100,000 and wants to replace 25 years of income (until age 65) at 6% investment return:
PV = $100,000 × [(1 - 1.06^-25) / 0.06] = $100,000 × 12.78 = $1,278,000
So if this person died today with no existing savings or insurance, the family would need $1.278 million invested at 6% to replace that $100,000 annual income for 25 years.
The math accounts for the fact that the insurance payout grows over time, so you don't need the full future value today — you need the present value that, invested prudently, generates the needed cash flow.
You've probably heard"buy 10-15x your annual income in life insurance." Let's test this against actual needs:
| Income | Years to Replace | Investment Return | Actual Need (PV) | 10x Income | 15x Income | Best Fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $75,000 | 25 | 6% | $959,000 | $750,000 | $1,125,000 | 13x |
| $100,000 | 25 | 6% | $1,278,000 | $1,000,000 | $1,500,000 | 13x |
| $150,000 | 20 | 6% | $1,472,000 | $1,500,000 | $2,250,000 | 10x |
| $50,000 | 30 | 6% | $620,000 | $500,000 | $750,000 | 12x |
The rule of thumb is reasonable, but the actual need depends heavily on time horizon and investment assumptions. Use our calculator to compute your precise need instead of relying on a generic multiple.
The insurance need (PV of future income) is reduced by:
If you have $200,000 in assets, that reduces your insurance need by $200,000. Not because the money is"used up," but because it's available to generate income if you die.
Example: Your $1.278M insurance need minus $200,000 in savings = $1.078M insurance needed.
Many employers offer life insurance (typically 1-2x salary). If your employer provides $200,000, that reduces your personal insurance need by $200,000. But don't rely on employer coverage alone — you lose it if you change jobs, and it's usually insufficient.
If you have dependent children, Social Security pays survivors benefits (roughly 75% of your PIA — Primary Insurance Amount, which is based on your earnings history). These aren't accounted for in our calculator but should be considered separately.
If your spouse can re-enter the workforce and earn $50,000/year, that fills part of the income gap. But many survivors delay work to manage young children, so don't over-estimate this.
The PV calculation assumes a fixed discount rate and time horizon. In reality, both vary:
Inflation erodes the purchasing power of insurance proceeds. A $1.278M payout sounds like a lot, but over 25 years at 3% inflation, that purchasing power declines materially.
Sensitivity to discount rate: A 6% assumption is reasonable for balanced portfolios, but if you're conservative (4-5% expected return), you need more coverage. If you're aggressive (7-8%), you need less.
Best practice: Run scenarios. Calculate your need at:
Buy coverage for the moderate-to-conservative scenario, not the optimistic case.
One of the biggest insurance mistakes: under-insuring stay-at-home parents. Because they don't earn W-2 income, people assume they don't need life insurance. This is backwards.
If a stay-at-home parent dies, the working parent faces:
The economic value of a stay-at-home parent easily exceeds $50,000/year. A family with two young children might need $100,000+/year replacement if that parent dies.
Recommendation: Both spouses should carry income replacement insurance, calculated on:
Income replacement insurance should last until financial independence, not until death. Once your investments can generate sufficient passive income, you don't need insurance anymore.
For most people, this means a term policy (temporary insurance, 20-30 years) rather than whole life (permanent insurance with high premiums).
| Age | Target Coverage Expiration | Recommended Term |
|---|---|---|
| 30 | Age 60-65 (financial independence) | 30-year term |
| 40 | Age 65 (Social Security + retirement accounts) | 25-year term |
| 50 | Age 65-70 | 15-20 year term |
A term policy is renewable, so you can extend if needed. But generally, the goal is to have sufficient assets by the end of the term that insurance becomes unnecessary.
Our Income Replacement Calculator lets you model your specific situation:
This shows you the precise insurance need and the gap between what you have and what you need.
For broader planning, see our Life Insurance Needs Calculator for a comprehensive assessment, or explore our Disability Insurance Calculator to evaluate income protection if you become unable to work.
Minimal. Pure income replacement insurance is for dependents who would suffer if you disappear. If you're single with no dependents, you need life insurance mainly to cover debts (funeral costs, outstanding loans). This is a small amount, often $50,000-$100,000, covered by employer policies or a cheap term policy.
Use a multi-year average of your income. If you're highly variable, consider coverage based on a conservative recent year rather than optimistic projections. It's better to be over-insured than under-insured.
Yes, unless you're building substantial assets simultaneously. As income grows, your family's lifestyle grows, and the income gap widens. Review coverage annually or after significant raises. Many people buy a base policy young and add additional coverage (often as term riders) later.
The calculator doesn't explicitly model inflation, but you can account for it by slightly reducing your expected investment return. If you expect 7% returns before inflation (which runs 2-3%), your real return is 4-5%. Use the lower figure to be conservative.
Buy what you can afford, prioritizing a term policy. Even $500,000 in coverage is better than zero. Revisit every 2-3 years — as your assets grow and career progresses, you often become self-insuring (need less coverage because you have more assets). Buy coverage when you're young and healthy; premiums increase with age and health changes.
DIME is an acronym for four insurance components:
D = Debt
All outstanding liabilities: credit card balances, personal loans, car loans, and any other debts. If you die, these don't disappear — your estate or co-signers are liable. Insurance should cover 100% of debt so your family inherits no financial obligation.
I = Income
Years of income to replace, typically calculated as: (years until retirement) × (annual income).
Example: 35-year-old earning $100,000, expecting to work until 65 = 30 years × $100,000 = $3,000,000
M = Mortgage
The outstanding mortgage balance. If you die, the surviving spouse likely wants to keep the home but can't afford the mortgage alone. Insurance should cover the remaining balance so the home can be kept mortgage-free or the family can choose to downsize without financial stress.
E = Education
College funding for dependent children. If you die, your family loses not only your income but also the ability to fund college savings. Estimate the total 4-year cost of college(s) for all dependent children and include this in coverage.
Total Coverage Needed = D + I + M + E
Example calculation for a 40-year-old:
This is roughly 29x the person's annual income — well above the"10-15x" rule of thumb, but appropriate given the specific family situation.
Comprehensive: It accounts for multiple types of financial obligations, not just income replacement. It's genuinely hard to over-insure using DIME because it's additive.
Easy to understand: You can calculate DIME on a napkin. Clients intuitively grasp it — no complex math or discount rate discussions.
Conservative: Because it doesn't factor in investment growth or time-decay of money, DIME often produces higher coverage amounts than strictly necessary. This is good — you'd rather be over-insured than under-insured.
Ignores investment growth: DIME assumes the insurance payout sits in a checking account. In reality, it's invested at 4-6% return annually, growing over time. This makes the need lower than DIME suggests.
Doesn't account for inflation on income: The"I" component assumes your income stays flat. In reality, absent your earning, your family's cost of living also doesn't inflate (some discretionary spending drops). This might partially offset the inflation issue, but it's not explicit.
Education component is blunt: College costs vary wildly ($30K-$100K+ annually depending on school). DIME just subtracts a lump sum, which may not align with actual need. If your kids are already in college when you die, the education component should be zero.
Mortgage component might be unnecessary: If your other assets and insurance could handle the income gap, your family could pay off the mortgage from that. DIME double-counts in this scenario.
The present-value (PV) method we discussed earlier is mathematically more precise but less intuitive than DIME. Let's compare both methods on the same person:
Person: 40-year-old, $120K income, 25 years to retirement
DIME Method:
PV Method (6% return assumption):
The PV method produces a $1.466M lower need because it accounts for investment growth. Both are defensible; DIME is conservative, PV is realistic. Best practice: buy at least the PV amount, and if DIME is higher, buy DIME.
If your family can live on survivor income (from insurance proceeds invested at 6%), they can likely afford the mortgage or downsize if needed. You might not need both the full mortgage payoff and the full income replacement component. Consider reducing the mortgage component if your income replacement is already robust.
DIME doesn't subtract existing savings. If you have $200,000 in investments, subtract that from your total DIME need. You're not double-insuring.
Adjusted DIME = (D + I + M + E) - Existing Assets
The"I" component assumes your surviving family maintains your entire current lifestyle. In reality, they'd likely:
You might model this by reducing the income years from 30 to 20, or the income percentage from 100% to 80%. This gives you a lower, more achievable coverage target while still providing genuine protection.
If both spouses work, both spouses need individual DIME calculations. A single-earner household needs different coverage than a dual-earner household (where each person has a lower income-replacement component but both need coverage).
Example: Both spouses earn $80,000.
Both need coverage, but the amounts differ based on their individual financial responsibilities.
Scenario 1: Young Family, High Earner
Scenario 2: Late-Career, High Net Worth
Scenario 3: Stay-at-Home Parent
Once you've calculated DIME (and potentially adjusted it), you may want to decide on the vehicle:
For simplicity and communication, yes. For precision, present-value calculators are better. Ideally, calculate both and buy coverage that satisfies whichever is higher. Our calculator uses PV methods but DIME is a solid sanity check.
No. Your coverage should be based on the amount owed, not the interest rate. If rates are high, the family could refinance or pay down the balance using insurance proceeds and other assets. Cover the balance, not the interest burden.
Review your coverage annually or when life changes (kids age, college plans shift, income changes). Insurance isn't set-and-forget; it should evolve with your life.
Yes. Calculate your total DIME need, then subtract existing coverage. Buy individual coverage for the gap. Many people under-insure because they forget to account for employer coverage that will disappear if they change jobs.
Term and whole life are completely different financial products, yet they're often presented as if they're competing versions of the same thing. They're not.
Term life insurance is pure insurance: you pay a monthly premium, and if you die during the coverage period (10, 20, or 30 years), your beneficiaries get the death benefit. If you survive the term, the policy expires worthless (from a cash perspective, though the peace of mind was real). It's like car insurance — you pay for protection, not building asset value.
Whole life insurance combines insurance with a forced savings account. You pay much higher premiums, part of which funds a death benefit and part of which goes into a cash value account that grows at a historically reliable (but modest) rate. You can borrow against this cash value or surrender the policy to recover it. It's insurance plus a savings vehicle in one product.
For a 35-year-old in good health, requesting $1 million coverage:
| Product | Monthly Premium | Annual Cost | 20-Year Total Paid |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20-Year Term | $35-50 | $420-600 | $8,400-12,000 |
| 30-Year Term | $50-75 | $600-900 | $12,000-18,000 |
| Whole Life | $200-350 | $2,400-4,200 | $48,000-84,000 |
Whole life premiums are 5-8x higher than term for the same death benefit. This isn't a coincidence — you're essentially paying for both insurance and a mediocre savings vehicle.
This is the classic argument against whole life. The theory: buy 20-year term for $600/year and invest the $1,800 difference in a brokerage account at 7% annual return. After 20 years:
| Term + DIY Investing | Whole Life | |
|---|---|---|
| Total premiums paid | $12,000 (term) + $36,000 (investing) = $48,000 | $48,000-$72,000 |
| Death benefit | $1,000,000 (if died during term) | $1,000,000 |
| Accumulated investments/cash value | $84,000 (DIY investments at 7% growth) | $80,000-120,000 (whole life cash value at 3-4% growth) |
| Net worth | $1,084,000 (if term expires but you're alive) | $1,000,000-$1,120,000 |
In the realistic scenario where you're alive at 55 and the term policy expires, the"buy term and invest" approach has produced superior wealth ($1.084M vs. $1.08-1.12M). More importantly, you had flexibility — you could have invested more in good years, rebalanced, or accessed the money without policy loans.
Historical data strongly supports this. Consumers who bought term and invested the difference over 20-30 years have dramatically outpaced whole life policyholders in total wealth accumulation.
The cash value growth rate in whole life is historically reliable but modest (3-4% annually), compared to historical stock market returns of 7-10%. You're paying for:
None of these justify the 5-8x premium markup for middle-income earners seeking pure income replacement.
Despite its cost, whole life does have legitimate uses:
If your estate exceeds $13.61M (2024 threshold), federal estate tax applies. Whole life can fund estate taxes, ensuring heirs inherit the full estate value. This is a genuine need that justifies the cost.
Business partners sometimes fund buy-sell agreements (cross-purchase agreements) with whole life, as the policy remains in force regardless of personal health changes. The cash value can also serve as loan collateral for business needs.
If you have a dependent who will always need care (severe disability), whole life provides permanent coverage beyond traditional retirement years. Term expires; whole life doesn't.
Some people genuinely won't save or invest on their own. For these individuals, the"forced savings" feature of whole life, while expensive, is better than zero savings. This is a psychological, not mathematical, argument.
Level-term: The death benefit stays constant throughout the period. $1M at year 1 = $1M at year 30. Most popular.
Decreasing-term: The death benefit decreases over time, matching a declining mortgage or debt obligation. Cheaper but less common and less flexible.
Recommendation: Level-term. Your income replacement need doesn't decline much over time, so level coverage is appropriate.
10-year term: Cheapest, but short. Only advisable if you're within a decade of full retirement or financial independence.
20-year term: The sweet spot for most young families. Provides coverage until the primary earner is in their 50s, near the point where financial independence becomes realistic.
30-year term: Appropriate for very young workers (20s) or those with decades until retirement. Slightly higher premiums than 20-year but locks in rates.
Look for policies that are:
Term life protects against death; disability insurance protects against inability to work due to injury or illness. For young workers, disability is statistically more likely than death.
Many people overlook disability insurance because they don't think about it, but it's critical for income replacement. A 35-year-old has a 1 in 4 chance of experiencing a disability lasting 3+ months before retirement. See our Disability Insurance Calculator to assess your need.
Once you've determined your need (using our Income Replacement Calculator), shop for rates from multiple carriers:
Get quotes from at least 3 carriers before deciding. A 35-year-old female in excellent health might get 20-year $1M term from Company A at $35/month and Company B at $50/month for the identical benefit.
Some policies advertise instant approval without medical exams. These are expensive, featuring 3-4x higher premiums than underwritten policies. The convenience isn't worth it unless you have serious health issues preventing you from getting standard coverage. Don't use these.
Almost certainly not for income replacement. Your need for income protection is temporary (until financial independence). Once you've built sufficient assets, you don't need insurance. Buy term matching your need horizon (20-30 years usually) and invest the savings.
If you're still in your term period, yes — your rate is locked in regardless of health changes. If your term expires and you reapply, poor health will increase your rate or result in decline. This is another reason to buy long-term coverage (30 years) when young and healthy.
Slightly more is fine (10-15% buffer for inflation and miscalculation). Significantly more ($2M when you calculated $1M need) means overpaying for years. Use the calculator to get precise, then buy matching that need plus a small buffer.
Yes, absolutely. Self-employed individuals often have less stable income, so underwriting is slightly more conservative, but availability and rates are comparable to W-2 employees.
Usually, you can reapply at better rates after 1-2 years of non-smoking. The original policy's premiums stay the same (locked in), but reapplying isn't possible without re-underwriting. It might be worth it if the rate improvement is substantial.
Rule of thumb: 10-15x annual income. More precisely: present value of future income minus assets. Factor in debts, childcare, and spouse's income.
DIME: Debt (all loans) + Income (years until retirement × salary) + Mortgage balance + Education (college for kids). Often yields 15-20x income.
Until financial independence — when your investments can support your family without insurance. Typically 20-30 year term policies for young families.
Term is pure insurance — cheap, high coverage, temporary. Whole life combines insurance with savings at high cost. Use term for income replacement, invest the savings.
Yes, including a stay-at-home parent. Replacing childcare, household management costs $150K+/year in market rates. Factor this into coverage needs.
Calculate total annual expenses your family would face without your income, including mortgage, childcare, education, insurance, and living costs. Subtract your spouse's income and existing assets to find the coverage gap to insure.
Disability insurance typically replaces 60-70% of gross income. Most policies cap at $10,000-$15,000 per month. The lower percentage accounts for disability benefits often being tax-free if you pay premiums with after-tax dollars.
At 3% inflation, $100,000 in annual expenses grows to $134,000 in 10 years and $181,000 in 20 years. Choose life insurance and disability policies with inflation riders, or increase coverage amounts to account for rising costs.
Own-occupation pays if you cannot perform your specific job duties. Any-occupation only pays if you cannot work any job at all. Own-occupation costs 20-40% more but provides far better protection, especially for specialized professionals.
Review coverage after salary increases above 20%, having a new child, purchasing a home, divorce, or a spouse leaving the workforce. Also review every 3-5 years to ensure coverage keeps pace with your lifestyle inflation.
Present value of income = Annual income × [(1-(1+r)^-n)/r] where r = discount rate, n = years to replace. Coverage needed = PV of income - existing assets - existing coverage.
Every formula on this page traces to a federal agency, central bank, or peer-reviewed institution. We cite the rule-makers, not secondhand blogs.
Found an error in a formula or source? Report it →
Calculations are for educational purposes only. Consult a qualified financial advisor for personalized advice.